Absolute perturbation measures do not account for this effect: they. Conclusion: Based on the literature and the proportional relationships and differences between the two systems and programs under consideration in this study, one can state that one can hardly compare frequency perturbation outcomes across systems and programs and amplitude perturbation outcomes across systems. Abstract Objective: The study is going to investigate the fundamental frequency (F (0)) and perturbation measures of sustained vowels in 360 native Malaysian Malay children aged between 7 and 12 years using acoustical analysis. deficit model, male speech behaviour is regarded as a norm from which women deviate. Furthermore, correlation analyses show weak to moderate proportional relationships between the two systems and weak to strong proportional relationships between the two programs. Measures of Voice: A Comparative Study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat. Results: Results indicate statistically significant differences between the two systems and programs, with the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program yielding consistently higher measures than Praat. Methods: Correlations and inferential statistics for seven perturbation measures (absolute jitter, percent jitter, relative average perturbation, pitch perturbation quotient, shimmer in decibels, percent shimmer, and amplitude perturbation quotient) in 50 subjects with various voice disorders are presented. In the present study, perturbation measures provided by two computer systems (a purpose-built professional voice analysis apparatus and a personal computer-based system for acoustic voice assessment) and two computer programs (Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat) were compared. ![]() ![]() The assessment of voice perturbation is influenced by several factors, including the type of recording equipment used and the measurement extraction algorithm applied. Department of Oto-rhino-laryngology and logopaedic-audiologic sciences (ceased 1-10-2018)Ībstract Background/Aims: Frequency and amplitude perturbations are inherent in voice acoustic signals. The four AASPs considered in this study are: Praat (version 5.1.31 by Boersma and Weenink), Wavesurfer (version 1.8.5 by the Centre for Speech Technology at KTH in Stockholm, Sweden), TF32 (alpha test version 1.2 - see Appendix A formerly CSpeech by Milenkovic), and CSL (Computerized Speech Laboratory model 4500, version 2.7.0 by Kay Elemetrics, currently known as KayPentax CSL.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |